Lanta Software

For teams building custom automation

Keep every engineering decision connected.

Lanta brings requirements, design reviews, changes, actions, and verification evidence into one traceable workspace—so engineering leaders can see what changed, who owns the next step, and what remains unresolved.

Early prototype for custom machinery and industrial automation teams.

Prototype interface
Synthetic review workspace showing a model revision, anchored findings, ownership, and follow-through.

Connected engineering workflow

  1. 01Customer scope
  2. 02Design review
  3. 03Change follow-through
  4. 04Configuration evidence

The coordination gap

The hardest part is the context between tools.

Customer commitments, CAD reviews, controls changes, shop-floor decisions, and test results often live in different places. Engineering leaders are left reconstructing what changed and whether the follow-through is complete.

Scope drifts

Requests, quotes, clarifications, and acceptance criteria can diverge without a visible decision trail.

Feedback loses its revision

A useful comment becomes ambiguous when the model, drawing, or configuration has already moved on.

Changes cross disciplines

Mechanical changes can create electrical, controls, procurement, assembly, and retest work that is easy to miss.

Evidence loses applicability

A prior result may still be valid—or may need review—when the tested configuration changes.

How the work connects

One connected thread from requirement to readiness.

Start where the work starts. Lanta keeps the source, revision, decision, owner, and evidence connected as the project moves.

  1. 01

    Capture the scope

    Keep customer requests, accepted commitments, assumptions, and unresolved differences visible beside their sources.

  2. 02

    Review in context

    Examine the relevant document or model revision, place a finding, and preserve the discussion and decision.

  3. 03

    Coordinate the change

    Assess affected work across disciplines, assign accountable actions, and separate technical decisions from commercial authorization.

  4. 04

    Verify the outcome

    Connect checks and evidence to the exact configuration, then expose what still blocks the next milestone.

Requirements & Scope

Know what was requested—and what was actually agreed.

Review requirements beside their source, separate assumptions from commitments, and record unresolved differences without turning a draft into an approval.

  • Source-linked requirements and acceptance criteria
  • Customer-request versus agreed-scope reconciliation
  • Visible owners, assumptions, and unanswered questions
Illustrative prototype interface

Reviews & Decisions

Keep design feedback attached to the exact revision.

Review translated models and supporting files in context, anchor findings, discuss them, assign ownership, and preserve the resulting decision.

  • APS-based 3D viewing within Lanta’s review workspace
  • Component-, point-, and file-level findings
  • Revision-aware discussion, disposition, and follow-up
Illustrative prototype interface

Changes & Actions

Turn a design decision into accountable follow-through.

Record the proposed departure, ask each discipline what is affected, and keep actions, blockers, authorizations, and verification conditions visible.

  • Explainable impact links rather than black-box certainty
  • Owners, dependencies, blockers, and completion evidence
  • Technical, commercial, implementation, and verification states kept separate
Illustrative prototype interface

Validation & Readiness

Explain what the evidence supports—and what remains unresolved.

Record checks and results for the configuration that was actually tested, review whether prior evidence still applies, and make milestone blockers explicit.

  • Configuration-specific checks, results, and evidence
  • Retest or justified-reuse decisions with history
  • Readiness for a named milestone, including conditions and punch items
Illustrative prototype interface

Existing tools remain authoritative

Built around the engineering work you already do.

Lanta connects the context around requirements, models, drawings, change records, and test evidence. Your CAD, PLM/PDM, controls, ERP, and formal release processes remain authoritative.

The prototype uses real APS model viewing. Other external-system connections will be evaluated with design partners instead of being implied today.

  • RequirementsSource and scope
  • Models & drawingsArtifact and revision
  • Change recordsDecision and owner
  • Test evidenceConfiguration and result

Design partner program

Help shape a better way to coordinate custom machine projects.

We’re speaking with engineering leaders at custom machinery and automation companies to test Lanta against real requirements, review, change, and validation workflows.

Discuss a design partnership

No self-serve signup. We’ll begin with a short conversation about your current workflow.

  • 01A focused four-month design partnership
  • 02Early product access and direct influence on priorities
  • 03Feedback around an agreed engineering workflow

FAQ

A few practical answers.

Lanta is an early product, and the boundaries matter as much as the ambition.

Who is Lanta for?

Lanta is being designed for engineering managers, directors, and cross-functional teams building customized machinery and industrial automation systems.

Does Lanta replace CAD, PLM, or controls tools?

No. Lanta connects requirements, reviews, changes, actions, and evidence around the tools and formal processes that remain authoritative.

Is the product available today?

Lanta is currently an early prototype demonstrated in guided sessions. We are speaking with potential design partners rather than offering self-serve access.

What is a design partnership?

The current program is intended as a focused four-month collaboration: early access in exchange for practical feedback on an agreed workflow. Specific terms are discussed directly.